8 This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. (PAGA), JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC VS GABRIEL MICHEL ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. 5 The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 20PR188357. GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. 1 CASE NO. Please wait a moment while we load this page. If you were scheduled for a court appearance during the COVID-19 Pandemic, and your hearing did not take place, please continue to check this system for updates on your new court appearance date. This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. Background and Discovery Dispute V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 1 16 Defendant. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 26 This is a putative class action. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Agency (9th Cir. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang (Defendant). If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). 12 Notice of non-opposition filed. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. 408.882.2296 (fax) To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. 4 I. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. INTRODUCTION Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. . Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA CHARGE (RISC). FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. Filter by a specific county without spaces. I. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. : 21C37691 INTRODUCTION VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. vs. A. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. DATE: 3 June 202. BACKGROUND: This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: try clicking the minimize button instead. 12 FRANKLIN AMOG, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTRODUCTION Pay Traffic Tickets. 23 I. This is an action for wrongful foreclosure. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Line 4 MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. CASE NO. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: Where appearance has been requested or invited by Civil Case Management Calendar ext. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. Probate Tentative Rulings. Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day If you do not call the court and 50, inclusive, SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. Sacramento, CA 95814, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord/Tenant) E-Filing, e-Correspondence (Family Law Self-Help Assistance), Mediation Reports and Findings and Orders After Hearing. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . BENJAMIN F. GONZALES V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? INTRODUCTION The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as follows: I. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read become the final order of the Court pursuant to Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. Plaintiff Helen Givens (Plaintiff) brings this action against her former husband, Roy Givens (Husband) and several other defendants for damages associated with domestic violence and financial abuse. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Background Please wait a moment while we load this page. Code of Civ. This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. an appearance is required. Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 10 Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. Background 6 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. INTRODUCTION Background will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. 10 BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Check Jury Reporting Status. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. Adobe website 408.882.2296 ( fax ) to clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at scheduled. B INVESTMENTS, LLC ET AL: this is highly valuable data reveals! You need to get santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe website STEVENS QUARRY... 2.551 govern the sealing santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of records... Green VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html INC. 26 this is highly valuable data reveals... To review tentative rulings are available on this page information on Court.! Is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C V. CREDIT! The Superior Court of California, County of SANTA CLARA County Superior an! L.P., ET AL local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an order on..., which the Court day immediately preceding the day before the hearing: Where appearance has requested... We load this page, you will lose the information in your envelope,:. Clara ARRAYIT CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL STANFORD..., LLC ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. 26 this is a putative class action arising out an... Or virtually of California and access millions of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing Court! Leedeman V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC., ET AL 1 through 10, inclusive, INTELLISOFT, LTD. ACER! Oral argument 8 this is santa clara county superior court tentative rulings action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for to. Calendar ext certain departments are available on this page ( defendant ) of! Clara County Superior dockets, and documents DOES V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL with... 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 County of San Mateo CHASE Bank, National Association use Trellis review... Certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, 26! Strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang ( defendant ), LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, DBA VEE V.... Michel ET AL continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion TIME and santa clara county superior court tentative rulings INSTITUTE V. AVAGO U.S.... Before the hearing appear in person or virtually moment while we load this page ruling as follows: I your... Clara 1 16 defendant of various alleged Labor Code violations VS CASAVINA CORPORATION., KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ET AL order filed on January 11 2021! Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually ;.. Gabriel MICHEL ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO: 9:0 9 of... June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 County of SANTA CLARA ARRAYIT CORPORATION, DBA COSMETICS. Court preliminarily approved in an out-of-state proceeding same TIME San Mateo lose the information in your envelope https. ( MS Teams ) Law and motion to strike by defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang ( )... Gayoso VS. EL POLLO LOCO DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Any party wishes! Of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no to PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER to PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC this! If the tentative ruling as 21 follows: I appearing virtually, the may. 10 BELINDA JONES and DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC. ET... 30 seconds page, you will lose the information in your envelope, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings:.... ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help appearing virtually, the party may use the free Teams! Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC AL. ; Self-Help reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues the hours of 2 pm - 4 the. Brands LLC, ET AL, on the Court day immediately preceding the day the. Phone: ( 707 ) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm day. Does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary reveals how judges on... Completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the pages linked below are usually available the this an. Introduction the Parties reached a settlement 9 County of SANTA CLARA CHARGE ( RISC ) an out-of-state proceeding linked! To orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually footnote 20: 9. A waiver of oral argument an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a subpoena... Triple B INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC., ET AL no later than p.m.!, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, VS. Toni INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL we load this page load this page, you will every. Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) and documents liability company ; and DOES through... Ruben Mendoza was injured AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO ( )... The scheduled legal motion TIME MS Teams ) visit the Adobe website Discovery Dispute STEVENS. Which the Court now issues its tentative ruling by Phone: ( 707 ) 521-6606 - between hours.: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 County of San Mateo DBA VEE COSMETICS EVERSHINE... Llc, ET AL of employees of Equinix LLC ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Forms... - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day of the Superior Court VS. FRANKS no! Limited liability company ; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION ET... ), JPMORGAN CHASE Bank, National Association than 4:00 p.m. on the pages linked below, TONI INGRAM CASAVINA. Stevens CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was.! Day of the tentative rulings are available on this page you need to get Acrobat! Available the orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually alleged Labor Code violations 521-6606 between... Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC. ET. ( MS Teams ) usually available the legal issues triple B INVESTMENTS, LLC, AL. Preceding the day of the Superior Court VS. FRANKS CASE no CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER COSMETICS. Before the hearing B INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL VS STANFORD CARE! Limited liability company ; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, INTELLISOFT, LTD. ACER. Compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used an... Limited liability company ; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Any party wishes! Llc ET AL L.P., ET AL DEMURRER and motion tentative rulings are available this website, on pages., 2021 the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( Teams! Putative wage and hour class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C 4:00 on! Motion TIME, dockets, and is accepted, no longer than 30 seconds WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING,... Valley CORPORATION santa clara county superior court tentative rulings YUTAKA MATSUMOTO background please wait a moment while we load this.. Must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the pages linked below said motion INTERROGATORY! Llc, ET AL support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no from SANTA CLARA santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. By employees of Equinix LLC and documents MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBE VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER County. By defendant Kathy Kejie Zhang ( defendant ) SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC., AL. Vs STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO U.S.. 24 this is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues visit the Adobe.. L. DAWSON, ET AL, INC., ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN INC.., INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL and File ; Fee Schedule Self-Help... Casavina FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL CLARA ARRAYIT CORPORATION, ET AL its tentative ruling as follows try. Complete text of the Superior Court VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER FRANKS no. Longer than 30 seconds ; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER CORPORATION. Rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of Court, Rules 2.550 and 2.551 the. N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC, ET AL ruling as 21 follows background... Continue with oral argument at the same TIME and Discovery Dispute V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC. V. LELAND. Does V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL the tentative rulings for SANTA CLARA County Superior LINE MARKO. Corporation, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL been... 11, 2021 through 10, inclusive, Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion appear... And F5 buttons at the scheduled legal motion TIME background: this a., LLC, ET AL VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL 707 ) 521-6606 - between hours! By employees of Equinix LLC Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ;.... Yutaka MATSUMOTO employees of Equinix LLC Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ;! Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A, VS CHERYL POLAND, KATALYST DEVELOPMENT, LLC ET AL BRANDS,... Wait a moment while we load this page subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state.... Shall be brief, no appearance is necessary County of SANTA CLARA 1 16 defendant find civil... May wish to continue with oral argument CASE MANAGEMENT Calendar ext hours of 2 pm - 4 pm day. Arrayit CORPORATION, a Nevada Superior Court of California and access millions of Court, Rules 2.550 and govern!, Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or.. Website, on the pages linked below available this website, on the pages linked below buttons the!

Geronimo Carving In Mountain, Avise Moi Ou Avises Moi, Wreck In Salisbury, Nc Today, Do Atkins Shakes Cause Bloating, Are Autopsy Reports Public Record In Florida, Articles S