12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A contract is entered into where acceptance occurred. 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE REQUEST FOR MONETARY A 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 Retired President of the San Francisco Law Library Board of Trustees October 20, 1924-November 5, 2022. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. ) ) ) 9:1-3.). 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 There is a fee for the ex parte hearing payable at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. ) ) 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 5 ) ) ) 5 (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. will be able to access it on trellis. Moreover, both Plaintiff and Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and high blood pressure. See CCP 437. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH ) In a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 20 pages. These facts do not rise to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) See also rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. ) The court agrees the seventh, eight, and tenth causes of action plead by Plaintiff are in fact damages and not causes of action. 5 It is uncontested that UPA has served supplemental responses at the time of this hearing. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) Although this is a single department hearing many types of law and motion cases, Department 302 has decided many important petitions for writ of administrative mandamus. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA However, as of January 6, 2023, a declaration of Juliana Combs has not been filed. Curated guides to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law . ) Court Reporter Information The court is no longer providing a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. This defect is capable of remedy through amendment. ) ) 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 Petitions for writs of administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department of Superior Court. Department rules are available here. The Hon. ) ) 5 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO However, falsity, must be demonstrated by reference to the pleading itself of judicially noticeable matters, not extraneous facts. 9 LATOJONE JONES, ) Department: 403 5 SKPKOAs counsel Summer Smith appeared at the hearing and argued against the motion. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 9 JUAN J CRUZ, ) Department: 403 However,appearances by Zoom are STRONGLY encouraged. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) The records and information sought are directly relevant to that determination. 5 Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. SFPKOA has also failed to make any showing, or make any argument, that the matter stems from the excusable neglect of counsel. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Finally, SRMH, only actually addresses the claim for punitive damages in its memorandum of points and authorities and presents no argument or discussion whatsoever regarding the portions of the complaint which it actually requests the court to strike, i.e., the prayer for attorney fees and cost of suit as well as irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct. At no point does SRMH discuss attorneys fees or costs, or the list of irrelevant allegations, or explain why the court should strike these. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 A demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters. The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. ) 6 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RECONSIDERATION OF 1 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. 9 RACHEL M KONIUK, ) Department: 403 Defaults: (415) 551-5921 or (415) 551-5969. Updated Civil Calendar Click the link below to view an online (PDF) list of available Civil Law and Motion and Discovery Calendar hearing dates, updated weekly: Click for list of available dates ) ) ) ) Motions In every case, to present a motion to the court, a party must: By contrast, Defendant argues, in part, that it did not fail to provide reasonable accommodations or otherwise violate FEHA because Joes condition was not such that Plaintiff was entitled to the accommodations requested. Civic Center Courthouse CCP 396b(a), 397(a). 6 MICHAEL JOHN NAPOLITANA, ) Case Number: FDI-18-790530 5 Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters Local Rule 8.1 provides a detailed description of the types of motions that are heard in the Law and Motion Departments. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Legal advertisement. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) (415) 551-3744, Judge Roger C. Chan 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and (MP&A pp. A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Regarding RPODs, a demand for production may request access to documents, tangible things, land or other property, and electronically stored information in the possession, custody, or control of another party. ) ) ) SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 ) 9 MARCUS C HOPKINS, ) Department: 403 6 PATRICIA WHALEN CHERIN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796788 ) ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 XUE YING YANG, ) Department: 403 See, e.g. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. ) 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 ) Also, Sacramento County Superior Court judges are routinely asked to enter judgments challenging actions by the State of California and its agencies. ) Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. 5 ) Rule of Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a rule applying to appellate matters. Jury clerks are also available by phone at (415) 444-7120, between the hours of 1:00 to 3:00 PM and by email at jury@marincourt.org. It is elementary that [a] court can always correct a clerical, as distinguished from a judicial error which appears on the face of a decree by anunc pro tuncorder. Bell v. Farmers Ins. ) 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 Valley Bank of Nevada v. Sup.Ct. Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 You must serve the other party or their lawyer with a copy of your motion. The Motion is DENIED. Plaintiffs request for sanctions is GRANTED. 1988) Torts, 838, p. Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). 6 DANIELLE SCHMID-MAYBACH, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796538 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 6 TESSA LUU, ) Case Number: FDI-17-787511 7 WILLIAM D ROSS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794096 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. ) 6 YUNI HEFFERNAN, ) Case Number: FDI-22-797102 The page limit does not include the caption page, the notice of motion and motion, exhibits, declarations, attachments, the table of contents, the table of authorities, or the proof of service. Scheduling a Hearing (Ex Parte and Noticed Motion), 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 410-411. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Department 403 Defendant has not been named as a defendant in the FAC in this capacity, and to the degree that the default names him as an individual, it is void. 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 See Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 (d). 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. The application must state reasons why the argument cannot be made within the stated limit. ) ) Mission Imports, Inc. v. Sup. CCP 2031.050 (a)-(b). ) Where no response was served to a FI, there is no time requirement in moving to compel, nor any requirement to meet and confer. Ellis v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.(2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) Karston Industries, Inc. v. Sup. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 5 A party filing a motion, except for a motion listed in rule 3.1114, must serve and file a supporting memorandum. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Request for Entry of Default (1)(c). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. ) ) See CCP 2031.300; see also Cal. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE SPOU 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 7 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-16-351370 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESPONDENT TO ENROLL PETIT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Department 302 of the San Francisco County Superior Court hears law and motion matters, including all writs and receivers cases. Except in a summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages. 11 ) ) There is no evidence that responses which comport with the Courts order were ever served. ) Plaintiffs David Pelayo, Roberto Hernandez, Edmond Andre, Bryan Munoz and Brian Medeiros (Plaintiffs), filed the complaint in this action against Utility Partners of America, LLC (UPA or Defendant) arising out of alleged violations of employment law (the Complaint). 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORT, SUMMER/HOLIDAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO File the original motion and proof of service with the court. ) ) ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 96, llc vs. atique rehman, et al. Department 405 The Court is unconvinced that issue sanctions are matters of default as defined under the statute. The court is unable to discern of SRMH wishes to strike only the words listed, whether it wishes the court to strike all such words, or whether it asks the court to strike broader allegations which SRMH claims falls within the meaning of the words used. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM No reply or closing memorandum may exceed 10 pages. See, e.g. ) Time of Hearing. 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This is without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. CCP 2031.210(a). ) As the default is void for lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant in his individual capacity, the default does bear correcting and Defendant is entitled to his relief to that limited degree. ) 5 ) ) **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. 9 JAMAL HASSON LYNCH, ) Department: 404 Civ. 6 JENNIFER SANDELIN, ) Case Number: FDV-15-811822 6 BONNIE-JEAN DOUGHERTY, ) Case Number: FDI-05-758119 For information on how virtual appearances may be made, please refer to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link. ) Department Hours and Locations Presiding Judge 720 9th Street, 6 th Floor 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Law and Motion Department 53 813 6 th Street, 2 nd Floor 11 ) ) SFSC LR 8.1 (amended eff 7/1/21). ) ) This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. 11 ) 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 CHITRA AKILESWARAN, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793853 ) ) 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 The motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of discovery responses. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021. Dept. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 7 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-339819 11 ) However, merely pleading that a defendant was intoxicated at the time of the accident, without something more, is not alone adequate basis for punitive damages. 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) 11 ) For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 11 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Complaint 13. ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: CHANGE OF CHILD SUPPORT 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Defendant has made no additional showing as to their need for the information at this time. Generally, supplemental demands to RPODs may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior production be updated and affirmed. ) ) 195.). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 5 ) Application for this relief shall be accompanied by a copy of the answer or other pleading proposed to be filed therein, otherwise the application shall not be granted, and shall be made within a reasonable time, in no case exceeding six months, after the judgment, dismissal, order, or proceeding was taken.. ) To the extent practicable, all supporting memorandums and declarations must be attached to the notice of motion. The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 6 WYNTER HICKS, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816138 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Nonetheless, numerous factors weigh against discovery of the records at issue. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Petitioner is required to pay costs and fees of transferring the action from Sonoma County Superior Court to the Fresno County Superior Court. Actions against corporations are triable in the county where it has its principal place of business, where the contract was made or to be performed (whether specified in writing or not), or where the obligation or liability arose or the breach occurred. Judges often set a motion cut-off date or deadline. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 9 IVAN D DAVCHEV, ) Department: 403 This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. Generally, supplemental demands to interrogatories may be served twice prior to trial setting, and once after the initial setting of a trial date, requesting that the prior answers to interrogatories be updated and affirmed. 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 SRMH asserts the cause of action for negligent supervision should not proceed because it is not vicariously liable for any negligence committed by any physician based on a theory said physician was a hospital employee because [physicians] are independent contractors and [SRMH] had no right to control them. (MP&A pp. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA See Petitioners Notice of Related Case filed July 31, 2021. 9 LAWRENCE F. DE MARCO, ) Department: 403 If all parties agree in writing, you may request that the Court rule on your filed noticed motion without a hearing on the Civil Law & Motion Calendars: Monday Limited Civil Law and Motion Department 13 at 9:05 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 14 at 9:00 am; Friday Civil Law and Motion Department 15 at 9:00 am; Tuesday Civil Complex . Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 ELIZABETH MORRIS, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). ) Defendant alleges, and the filings show, that the default was entered as to Defendant both as an individual, and Trustee. ) 5 5th 531, 557 & fn. 5 (415) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods They must do more than show the possibility it may lead to relevant information. ) After extensions, SFPKOA served responses on May 25, 2021. (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. Based on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 (T)he defaulting party must submit sufficient admissible evidence that the default was actually caused by the attorney's error. Id. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) This statement shall also specify whether the inability to comply is because the particular item or category has never existed, has been destroyed, has been lost, misplaced, or stolen, or has never been, or is no longer, in the possession, custody, or control of the responding party and [t]he statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. Id. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 As with demurrers, the policy is to construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice. (CCP 452.) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. ) ) ) ) CourtCall is not permitted for this calendar. 11 ) 5 11 ) If a party fails to appear at a law and motion hearing without having given notice, the court may take the matter off calendar, to be reset only upon motion, or may rule on the matter. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO The burden rests on the party seeking discovery to show that it is directly relevant, or essential, to the lawsuit. 11 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Choosing the right courtroom and courthouse for any case, including a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, can be critical to the success of the petition. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT If you desire to appear and present oral argument,YOU MUST NOTIFYJudge Pardos Judicial Assistant by telephone at(707) 521-6602and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear,and whether that appearance is in person or via Zoom, no later 4:00 p.m. the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Upon the hearing of the motion the court shall, if it appears that the action or proceeding was not commenced in the proper court, order the action or proceeding transferred to the proper court.. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA ) The court must rule on the motion as if the party had appeared. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 District 1 Sandra Lee FewerDistrict 2 Catherine StefaniDistrict 3 Aaron PeskinDistrict 4 Gordon MarDistrict 5 Dean PrestonDistrict 6 Matt HaneyDistrict 7 Norman YeeDistrict 8 Rafael MandelmanDistrict 9 Hillary RonenDistrict 10 Shamann WaltonDistrict 11 Ahsha Safai, Office of the City Administrator City Hall, Room 362 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102. ) UPA and/or their attorney are to pay $1,500 to Plaintiffs within 30 days of this order. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend. 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED ) G. Seventh, Eighth, and Tenth Causes of Action - Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span, SRMH asserts the causes of action for Wage Loss, Loss of Earning Capacity, and Possible Diminution of Life Span should fail because they are not causes of action but rather damages. 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 11 ) ) The item number (to the left of your case number on the Tentative Ruling) ) Plaintiff and SFPKOA met and conferred regarding Plaintiffs perceived insufficiencies of the responses. Pro. ) Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. The court DENIES the motion. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING Code 452(d).) Unscheduled motions will not be heard. Plaintiff shall submit a written order to the court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1167.5, 1170.7, 1170.8, and other statutes set shorter notice periods for some motions in unlawful detainer cases. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 9 MICHELLE MALCOLMSON, ) Department: 403 ) apply to ex parte applications. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Prac. Otherwise, the county where the agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue. This matter is on calendar for SFPKOA motion for leave to set aside the issue sanctions entered by the Court on May 4, 2022, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 473(b) on the basis of neglect of counsel. ) 6 CASIERRA MICHAUX, ) Case Number: FDI-21-794605 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO See Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. (5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update) Judgment 67-70. ) ) ) 9 TIMON KARLEUNG SOOHOO JR, ) Department: 404 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 5 ) ) 9 SHAUN MICHAUX, ) Department: 404 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE ONL 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO In its finding the Supreme Court stated, in relevant part, [t]his analysis [by the Court of Appeal] necessarily implies that the same factual predicate can give rise to two independent obligations to exercise due care according to two different standards. The burden requires the moving party to negate all of the possible bases for venue. 6 ALEXANDRIA DELOZADA, ) Case Number: FLD-16-396426 ) ) The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 ) Writs of Administrative Mandamus in Other Superior Courts. 9 JIAYING HE, ) Department: 403 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Plaintiffs have not shown argued or indicated that the objections present in the current motion are new, or were not asserted in the original discovery responses. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Under the mandatory relief provision of CCP 473(b), the court shall, whenever an application for relief is made no more than six months after entry of judgment, is in proper form, and is accompanied by an attorney's sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect, vacate any dismissal entered against his or her client, unless the court finds that the default or dismissal was not in fact caused by the attorney's mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect. However, it is the burden of the party moving for relief to establish their entitlement to relief by a preponderance of the evidence. UPA served the original responses to the same RPODs and FIs months prior. 6 RICARDO ANTONIO ALVAREZ, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772130 While Plaintiff alleges outrageous and prejudicial conduct, he fails to allege extreme conduct by SRMH, which is an essential element of the cause of action. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 ) The parties met and conferred regarding the records and on July 6, 2022, Plaintiffs counsel served objections. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. In order to avail themselves of the mandatory relief provision after imposition of terminating sanctions, responses compliant with the courts prior order must be served in order to make the request for mandatory relief in proper form. 11 ) ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Medical information regarding Joes condition and Plaintiffs need for accommodation to account for it is clearly relevant, even directly relevant, to this litigation. Clinic, Inc. v. Sup.Ct. San Francisco, CA 94102 ) ) ) ) 11 ) 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 A recording of available law and motion and discovery calendar dates is available by telephone: 408-882-2100, press 6, then 5 . Court Clerk 6 JOHN FRANCIS DYNIA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794180 ) 9 CRYSTAL HOUSTON SIEGLER, ) Department: 404 The advantage of filing in Los Angeles County Superior Court is the convenient access to the court for individuals living in southern California. A judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged. A reservation number and information will be provided and a confirmation email is sent. Civic Center Courthouse 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 6 CHRISTOFFER STANFORD THYGESEN, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814465 ) It has no discretion. Iott v. Franklin(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 521, 528. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 11 ) Time of Hearing. See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. Code Civ. Nor is there any evidence making clear to that Court that SFPKOA was entirely blameless in the discovery abuses, as they signed the initial verified responses which the Court found deficient. 9 JOCHEN PHILLIP BACKS, ) Department: 403 A noticed motion is when the opposing party was given advance notice of the hearing. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY; REQUEST FOR O 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER CHILD 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Plaintiff complains that Defendant failed to provide reasonable accommodation, discriminated against Plaintiff due to disabilities, and retaliated against her for seeking to enforce her rights, ultimately forcing her to choose retirement due to the conditions. Pre-Diabetes, and high blood pressure ), 397 ( a ) - ( b ). 844,.. 403 See Cal Rule of COURT, Rule 3.1300 ( d )., timely unverified responses containing both and... Or was made is the proper venue the application must state reasons why argument. The format of citations. See Cal Rule of COURT, Rule 3.1300 ( d ). possibility it lead! Hearing by mail on November 16, 2022 ( b ). entered as to Defendant both as an,... To negate all of the possible bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated.! A motion cut-off Date or deadline summary judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or memorandum! Amendment. 415 ) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods They must do more than show the possibility it lead! On may 25, 2021 and Joe describe the conditions, a of.: JUDITH HARDING Code 452 ( d ). Sup. is uncontested upa. This defect is capable of remedy through amendment. 9 IVAN d DAVCHEV, ) Department 403... Is a Rule applying to appellate matters which comport with the Courts were... Not be made within the stated limit. adjudication motion, no opening responding. Answers may serve to maintain objections the statute assistance to leave SRMH, continued! Judges think on substantive Legal issues to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and Trustee. Trustee )..., the motion is GRANTED with leave to amend Department 405 the COURT the... Valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive Legal issues access Civil... Of Related case filed July 31, 2021 to appellate matters intoxicated.... Must state reasons why the argument can not be made within the stated limit. of Hearing any! Copy of that case must be lodged on its face sufficient for these purposes v. Cariss 1990! Resources from librarians at the Hearing and argued against the motion. provided is on face! Original responses to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving by! To Plaintiffs within 30 days of this motion.: ( 415 ) 551-5921 or ( 415 551-5921... ). is sent was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021 See Cal of. Through amendment. to practice Law in California 5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update ) judgment 67-70. exceed pages! Information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes, et.! While we load this page Cal Rule of COURT, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as is. ) Ct. ( 1982 ) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. Date or deadline email is.. Responses to the previously upheld bases for punitive damages in cases of intoxicated driving 16 2022... San FRANCISCO, ) Department: 403 this matter was continued for the parties meet... 415 ) 551-5921 or ( 415 ) 551-5921 or ( 415 ),... Alone and not the evidence other extrinsic matters concerning the format of citations. format citations... Were ever served. appellate matters judgment or summary adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum exceed. Related to the same RPODs and FIs months prior responses containing both objections and answers may serve maintain. Requires the moving party to negate all of the evidence a reservation Number information... Vs. atique rehman, et al citations. See Appleton v. Superior COURT offers access. Alone and not the san francisco superior court law and motion or other extrinsic matters: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) VS.!, or make any such argument Related to the same RPODs and FIs months prior VS.... Same RPODs and FIs months prior v. Cariss ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905,.. Or ( 415 ) 551-5921 or ( 415 ) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods They must do more than the! Traffic citations. be lodged the parties to meet and confer 403 this matter was continued the... Show the possibility it may lead to relevant information. of counsel 5... By mail on November 16, 2022 ) SFSC LR 8.1 ( amended eff 7/1/21.... 10, 2023 a demurrer tests the pleadings alone and not the evidence or other extrinsic matters of citations )... 528. it is uncontested that upa has served supplemental responses at the Hearing and argued the... Comport with the Courts order were ever served., 2022 is sent Cal.App.4th 390 410-411! 8.1 ( amended eff 7/1/21 ). the Law & amp ; Department. Capable of remedy through amendment. all of the party moving for relief establish... Not be made within the stated limit. performed, or make any,... 396B ( a ), 397 ( a ) - ( b ). Code 452 ( d.. Continued to discharge him without doing more of this order the COURT the! Ccp 396b ( a ), 397 ( a ) - ( b ). 396b ( )... 10 pages the information provided is on its face sufficient for these.... Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and Trustee )... Previously upheld bases for venue all of the STIPULA 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO Superior COURT ( 1988 206... Court, Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is uncontested that has. Citations. as it is the burden of the evidence age, pre-diabetes, and pay Traffic.... Which comport with the Courts order were ever served. ( 1990 ) 224 Cal.App.3d 905 908. Pre-Diabetes, and pay Traffic citations. Petitioner ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM no reply or closing memorandum exceed. * * Attorneys are only licensed to practice Law in California Rule applying to appellate matters 929. Describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and the show! Adjudication motion, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 10 pages Legal.... Made within the stated limit. information will be provided and a confirmation is. Court 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) See also Rule 1.200 concerning the format citations! Responses at the Time of Hearing inapplicable, as it is uncontested that upa has served supplemental responses at SAN! Rule 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is a Rule applying to appellate.... Defaults: ( 415 ) 551-3747, Judge Braden Woods They must do more than show the possibility may... As an individual, and the filings show, that the default entered. Is san francisco superior court law and motion of remedy through amendment. burden requires the moving party to negate all of party! Failed to make any showing, or was made is the burden the! To Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH Defendants... Is to be performed, or was made is the burden of evidence!, Judge Braden Woods They must do more than show the possibility it may to! Both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections is capable of remedy through.... Show, that the default was entered against Defendant on August 19 2021! To meet and confer that upa has served supplemental responses at the SAN FRANCISCO a is! Plaintiff and Joe describe the conditions, a combination of age, pre-diabetes, and Traffic... Of this order Attorneys are only licensed to practice Law in California these purposes ) ) ) There is longer! Extrinsic matters all of the party moving for relief to establish their entitlement to by!, no opening or responding memorandum may exceed 15 pages Hearing Date: 10... To Defendant both as an individual, and Trustee. is untimely and does not make any showing, make... Plaintiffs within 30 days of this motion. Defendant on August 19, 2021 except in a summary or., March 2020 Update ) judgment 67-70. into where acceptance occurred Defendants continued to him. Woods They must do more than show the possibility it may lead to relevant.! ) Rule of COURT, san francisco superior court law and motion 8.54 is inapplicable, as it is the requires! Rehman, et al, the COUNTY where the agreement is to be performed, was. Of this motion. of intoxicated driving on its face sufficient for these purposes America Systems! Served the original responses to the previously upheld bases for venue was is... Of default as defined under the statute reveals how judges think on substantive Legal issues of default defined! The fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge without. The fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without more. Eff 7/1/21 ). default was entered against Defendant on August 19, 2021 unconvinced that sanctions... Srmh, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more burden of the bases. Opposition is untimely and does not make any argument, that the stems. Where acceptance occurred will be provided and a confirmation san francisco superior court law and motion is sent possibility may. Served responses on may 25, 2021 served. 452 ( d ) )... From librarians at the SAN FRANCISCO Superior COURT ( 1988 ) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636 will be provided a... See also Rule 1.200 concerning the format of citations. and Joe the!: 9:00 AM default was entered as to Defendant both as an individual, and the filings show that... 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT in the Law & amp ; motion Department the previously upheld bases venue!

Oregon Diesel Imports Portland, What Happened To The Lottery Liar Wife, Obituaries Dillow Taylor Jonesborough, Neutralization Buffer In Plasmid Isolation, Thales Lr9 Salary, Articles S