A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. While working as an associate at a law firm, she submitted false billing records totaling 86.4 hours, which resulted in one of the firm's clients being overbilled by $40,176. He also pled guilty to a misdemeanor charge of driving under the influence of alcohol. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona suspended him for six months and one day, and required that, following a reinstatement hearing, he would be subject to probation and additional terms. The Supreme Court of Florida permanently revoked his admission to the Florida Bar after he filed a petition for disciplinary revocation without leave to apply for readmission, which stated that he was the subject of a disciplinary grievance alleging, in part, misuse of funds totaling $4,175,000. Ms. Yohanna, who was licensed in 2009, was suspended for six months. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. The suspension is effective on February 10, 2022. He was found guilty following a jury trial of two charges of knowingly making false statements to a financial institution and five charges of tax fraud. After the representation of that client ended and the client did not repay the loans, one of Mr. McNabola's partners represented Mr. McNabola's father in a collection lawsuit against the former client. Antonio Brown's Snapchat account has been suspended in the wake of the former NFL receiver posting a sexually explicit image of the mother of his children, TMZ . He delayed in filing a probate case and misled his client about the case's status. As an associate at a Chicago law firm, he falsely billed over 2,000 hours of time to a pro bono matter that had ended, which resulted in his being terminated. Mr. Sanchez was licensed in Illinois in 2003 and in Missouri in 2010. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Norsigian was licensed in Missouri in 1988 and in Illinois in 1989. She made false statements to a federal judge about her authority to settle a case, then made additional false statements to her supervisors about the cases status. Mr. Moore, who was licensed in 1986, was suspended for one year and until further order of Court. Mr. McCulloh, who licensed in 1983, was suspended from the practice of law for one year, with the suspension stayed after 60 days in favor of a one-year period of probation. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. He also made false statements regarding his conduct to the investigating detective. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. She also engaged in the unauthorized practice of law for approximately two months after having been removed from the roll of attorneys for failure to register, and she made false statements to the ARDC during its investigation of her case. She refused to agree to the terms of probation. The suspension is effective on October 12, 2022. ARDC seeks suspension in $80K client fraud. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. Mr. Ybarra failed to diligently represent clients in several matters, including divorce and family-law cases, made misrepresentations to clients about the status of their matters, and did not refund unearned fees to a number of those clients. Generally. The suspension is effective on December 7, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year and until further order of the Court. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. Mr. Buhl was licensed in Illinois in 1985 and in Connecticut in 1987. Mr. Fieweger was licensed in Illinois in 1987 and in Iowa in 1989. Mr. Gordon, who was licensed in 2010, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court, stayed after six months by a six-month period of conditional probation. He failed to diligently handle a number of bankruptcy matters, did not adequately communicate with those clients, and made misrepresentations to those clients and his employer about the status of the cases. Between March and May 2018, Mr. Rueda converted over $15,000 in four client matters due in part to his failure to keep appropriate trust account records. The suspension will be effective 7 calendar days after receipt of notice unless, an objection is filed. Concurrently, total land growth rate decreased from 2.4 km2 y 1 to 1.6 km 2y 1 for ARSD and 3.2 km2 y 1to 0.6 km y for WLSD. Ms. Jones, who was licensed in 2014, was suspended for nine months. Over an eight-month period, he used more than $16,000 in funds belonging to a bar association of which he was then president, without authority, by withdrawing funds from the associations bank account and charging personal expenses to the associations credit and debit cards. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. Mr. Raines was licensed in Missouri in 1989 and in Illinois in 1997. Mr. Patel, who was licensed in 2012, was suspended on an interim basis and until further order of the Court after he pled guilty in a California federal court to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and manipulative trading. To verify that a particular lawyer is the respondent named in a proceeding, please call the Clerk's Office of the ARDC at (312) 565-2600 or within Illinois at (800) 826-8625. Mr. Bracamonte filed asylum applications without an indicated basis for asylum, he canceled asylum interviews or advised his clients not to appear for asylum interviews, and he failed to demonstrate a clear intention to pursue an asylum claim, causing prejudice to his client. Mr. O'Shea, a former circuit court judge who was licensed in 1979, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. Mr. Blumenfeld, who was licensed in 1967, was disbarred on consent. This page contains ARDC summaries of recent disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended her for one year and until she is reinstated to the practice of law in Missouri. Mr. Weber, who was licensed in 1984, was disbarred. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Supreme Court of Arizona suspended her for six months and one day. He failed to diligently pursue a workers' compensation and a personal injury matter and misrepresented the status of those matters to his clients. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. He neglected an incarcerated client's post-conviction matter and failed to communicate with that client. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. Ill. S. Ct. R. 774(a)(1). Ms. Winbush, who was licensed in 2013, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed in its entirety by a two-year period of probation with conditions. While working as an investigator for the Civilian Office of Police Accountability ("COPA") in Chicago, she repeatedly, and without authorization, accessed a private database of police records in violation of the terms of her employment. Mr. Willey was licensed in Illinois in 2008 and in Iowa in 1993. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. His misconduct arose from his Michigan criminal convictions for manufacturing marijuana, maintaining a drug house, and possession of marijuana with the intent to deliver. The suspension is effective on June 9, 2022. The Superior Court later suspended Mr. Buhl for two years, retroactive to October 15, 2019, and required him to apply for reinstatement to the practice of law, for illegally operating a motor vehicle and failing to participate in his disciplinary proceedings. Ms. Calloway, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for one year and until further order of the Court. She did not diligently handle two dissolution of marriage matters and one child custody matter, and she repeatedly failed to respond to clients' requests for information about their cases. Her discipline arose from her conviction for battery resulting in bodily injury for struggling and twice spitting on a police officer who had taken her to a hospital for a blood draw after stopping her on suspicion of impaired driving. Debarment is the permanent suspension of a vendor from doing business with the OAG. Mr. Cunningham, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for six months. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline, reprimanding her and placing her on a one-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to May 10, 2022, subject to the conditions imposed by Arizona and continuing until she successfully completes her Arizona probation. The Supreme Court of Missouri disbarred him for dishonestly failing to pay fees owed to a deceased attorney's trust after Mr. Raines took over representation in a number of cases on which the deceased attorney had worked prior to his death. The payments totaled over $136,000. January 17, 2023 3:31pm. Mr. Liles, who was licensed in 2005, was suspended from the practice of law for one year and until further order of the Court, with the suspension stayed after six months by a two-year period of probation. The suspension is effective on April 6, 2021. The suspension is effective Oct.14. He also made misrepresentations to the client, a third party, and the ARDC, which included fabricating a file-stamp to make it appear that he had filed the brief. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and suspended him for 180 days, with the suspension stayed after 90 days by a two-year period of probation, nunc pro tunc to January 14, 2021, subject to the conditions imposed in Indiana, and continuing until his probation in Indiana is terminated. Then, in the course of seeking other employment, Mr. Paleczny falsely told at least four prospective employers that he had been laid off from his prior firm. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him. The Supreme Court of Missouri suspended her indefinitely, with no leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of six months. Mr. Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of the Court. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. She also did not communicate with clients about the status of their matters, inform her clients that she was closing her law practice, timely refund advanced fees that she had not earned, or safekeep client funds. A judge held her in contempt for failing to appear at multiple court dates in a dissolution of marriage matter. He used his former firm's bank account information without permission to pay his attorney registration fees, and he made misrepresentations to the Administrator in writing and in his testimony at a sworn statement during the investigation of his conduct. The suspension is effective on February 11, 2021. Mr. Gordon failed to file a brief in his client's criminal appeal and did not refund the fees he received for the representation. The Supreme Court of Colorado disbarred him for not diligently representing three clients in patent matters, failing to keep clients informed about the status of their matters, converting client funds in two of the matters, and abandoning two of the clients. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. He also prepared and had that defendant sign a typewritten incriminating statement, which he then filed with a motion to reduce bond in his own client's case. Mr. Luchtenburg, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for 30 days. Mr. Bowe was licensed in Illinois in 1982 and in New Jersey in 1984. The suspension is effective on June 8, 2021. Mr. Koenig, who was licensed in 1975, was suspended for one year for intentionally converting $70,076 in funds that were owed to his client after the settlement of a lawsuit over the construction of a will. Mr. Bracamonte was licensed in Illinois in 1979 and in Arizona in 1988. The ARDC may seek an interim suspension whenever an attorney has been charged with (as opposed to convicted of) a crime that involves moral turpitude or a crime that reflects adversely on the attorney's fitness to practice law, and there is persuasive evidence to support the charge. The Supreme Court of Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and placed him on probation for 12 months, nunc pro tunc to July 3, 2018, subject to the conditions imposed in Missouri, and continuing until he completes the period of probation in Missouri. His wife, a paralegal at the firm, fraudulently opened accounts in the law firm's name using names of relatives and then used funds from those accounts to pay for law firm and personal expenses. Ms. Kooi was licensed in Indiana in 2009 and in Illinois in 2010. The Supreme Court of California suspended him for two years, stayed after 90 days by two years of probation with conditions, for misusing his client trust account over a 17-month period and failing to respond to California bar authorities' requests for information about his conduct. In another case, she failed to timely turn over a client file to new counsel and was sanctioned by the court for not complying with various court orders. The Chair of the Attorney Discipline Probable Cause Committee of the Supreme Court of Arizona admonished her and placed her on a two-year period of conditional probation. Mr. McIntyre, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 18 months and until further order of the Court. Mr. Mr. Hamill, who was licensed in 1991, was suspended for three years and until further order of the Court and until he makes restitution to his former client. Reinstatement is not automatic and must be allowed by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC Hearing Board. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin 1) publicly reprimanded him for providing incompetent representation, engaging in action that served merely to harass or maliciously injure an opposing party, and engaging in an ex parte communication with a court; 2) suspended him for 60 days for neglecting two client matters, failing to communicate with those clients, and failing to make a reasonably diligent effort to comply with discovery requests; and 3) suspended him for 60 days for mishandling his trust account, and failing to cooperate with a disciplinary investigation. Mr. The Supreme Court of Iowa suspended him with no possibility for reinstatement for 30 days. Updated. Pursuant to amended Supreme Court Rule 756 (i), the reinstatement fee is $25 per month, subject to a $600 cap. The Supreme Judicial Court of Maine publicly reprimanded him and suspended him for nine months. A suspension until further order of the Court is an indefinite suspension which requires the suspended lawyer to petition for reinstatement after the fixed period of suspension ends. He did not supervise non-lawyer employees of the firm who spoke with consumers about their potential bankruptcy matters, he did not supervise the handling of funds that clients paid to the firm, and he did not ensure that appropriate records were kept concerning the firms bank account. Ms. Susman, who was licensed in 1983, was suspended for five months, with the suspension stayed in full by one year of probation with conditions. The suspension is effective on October 14, 2021. The Missouri Supreme Court indefinitely suspended him, with the suspension fully stayed by a one-year period of probation with conditions, and ordered that, should probation be revoked and the suspension take effect, no petition for reinstatement would be considered for a period of six months from the date the suspension became effective. She assisted a disbarred attorney in the unauthorized practice of law by representing an individual in a workers' compensation case without the individual's consent, thereby allowing the disbarred attorney to falsely represent himself to the individual as being able to practice law. He also made false or misleading statements in connection with the Administrator's investigation of his conduct. 26037, 2010 PR 64 (Ill. Sept. 26, 2013). He made false statements in federal court pleadings and in communications with opposing counsel and court personnel alleging a fictitious illness as his reason for seeking extensions of time in matters. Mr. Kolb, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for 30 days. Mr. Easley failed act with reasonable diligence to complete an elderly client's estate planning matter and did not reasonably communicate with the client. The suspension is effective on April 15, 2022. Johnson, Matter Number: 2022PR00007, In re Jessica Rose Allen, Matter Number: 2021PR00055, In re Roni S. VanAusdall, Matter Number: 2021PR00039, In re Patrick Daley Thompson, Matter Number: 2022PR00014, In re Paul D. Buhl, Matter Number: 2021PR00075, In re Robert John Hankes, Matter Number: 2019PR00102, In re Brent Michael Wills, Matter Number: 2021PR00021, In re Timothy J. Fitzgerald, Matter Number: 2017PR00116, In re Michael Christopher Burr, Matter Number: 2021PR00004, In re Mark A. Hamill, Matter Number: 2021PR00016, In re Edward William Hynes, Matter Number: 2021PR00065, In re Jeffrey Marc Benjamin, Matter Number: 2021PR00052, In re William John Bowe, Matter Number: 2021PR00058, In re Patrick Jon Hudec, Matter Number: 2021PR00060, In re Thomas Michael Barrett, Matter Number: 2021PR00064, In re Jennifer Prager Sodaro, Matter Number: 2021PR00066, In re Robert Lee Officer, Matter Number: 2021PR00068, In re Sean Michael Liles, Matter Number: 2020PR00022, In re Leijuana Doss, Matter Number: 2021PR00022, In re Wanemond Smith, Matter Number: 2020PR00089, In re John P. Jacoby, Matter Number: 2021PR00067, In re Michael Leonard Loprieno, Matter Number: 2019PR00101, In re James Robert Mason, Matter Number: 2021PR00045, In re Todd William Sivia, Matter Number: 2021PR00015, In re Matthew Clay Piatt, Matter Number: 2021PR00024, In re Carrie Kooi, Matter Number: 2021PR00023, In re Barbara Julia Luther, Matter Number: 2021PR00025, In re Michael Bernard Potere, Matter Number: 2021PR00026, In re Cynthia Jean Koroll, Matter Number: 2016PR00079, In re Lisa Michelle Edgar, Matter Number: 2021PR00027, In re Craig Carnell Cunningham, Matter Number: 2019PR00019, In re Donald George Groble, Matter Number: 2020PR00081, In re Bryan S. Flangel, Matter Number: 2021PR00029, In re Andrew Martin Stroth, Matter Number: 2019PR00065, In re Alan Kent Wittig, Matter Number: 2021PR00033, In re John Anthony Ward, Matter Number: 2021PR00034, In re Henry A. Weber, Matter Number: 2020PR00087, In re James Mark McTighe, Matter Number: 2021PR00035, In re Efrain L. Sanchez, Matter Number: 2021PR00036, In re John George Steckel, Matter Number: 2021PR00038, In re Stephen Thomas Fieweger, Matter Number: 2021PR00042, In re Veronica Reyes, Matter Number: 2021PR00043, In re Peter J. Kovac, Matter Number: 2021PR00046, In re Edward Sergio Rueda, Matter Number: 2020PR00042, In re Brian David Pondenis, Matter Number: 2020PR00048, In re Mark Vincent Kelly, Matter Number: 2020PR00029, In re Barry Edward Blumenfeld, Matter Number: 2021PR00057, In re Stephanie Alexandra Gerstetter, Matter Number: 2021PR00050, In re Nathaniel Gordon, Matter Number: 2020PR00059, In re Jessica Lynn Jones, Matter Number: 2021PR00020, In re John Paul Paleczny, Matter Number: 2021PR00051, In re Jennifer Prager Sodaro, Matter Number: 2020PR00080, In re Jeffrey P. White, Matter Number: 2021PR00003, In re Hrant Norsigian Jr., Matter Number: 2021PR00005, In re Marie A. Durbin, Matter Number: 2021PR00006, In re Radford Reuben Raines III, Matter Number: 2021PR00007, In re Eric James Dale, Matter Number: 2021PR00009, In re Howard Randolph Baker Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00061, In re Michael Lee Henneberry, Matter Number: 2021PR00011, In re John Thomas Sheets, Matter Number: 2020PR00075, In re Dwight White, Matter Number: 2020PR00006, In re John L. Allen, Matter Number: 2021PR00013, In re William Briskin Kohn, Matter Number: 2019PR00008, In re Nikola Duric, Matter Number: 2015PR00052, In re Shelby Kanarish, Matter Number: 2021PR00014, In re Patrick J. O'Shea, Matter Number: 2020PR00037, In re Joseph C. Farwell, Matter Number: 2019PR00089, In re Lee Jackson, Matter Number: 2020PR00079, In re Joshua Nathan Levy, Matter Number: 2020PR00082, In re Rufus James Tate Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00085, In re Michael Jerome Moore, Matter Number: 2020PR00017, In re Ryne DeGrave, Matter Number: 2020PR00044, In re Jose Arvizu Bracamonte, Matter Number: 2021PR00001, In re Burton Douglas Stephens Jr., Matter Number: 2020PR00021, In re Oscar Antonio Gonzalez, Matter Number: 2018PR00066, In re Nathaniel Jay Pomrenze, Matter Number: 2019PR00059, In re John Henry Salgado, Matter Number: 2019PR00073, In re Christopher Steven Jones, Matter Number: 2020PR00067, In re John Christopher Carver, Matter Number: 2020PR00074, In re Jan R. Kowalski, Matter Number: 2020PR00077, In re Robert Michael Kowalski, Matter Number: 2020PR00078, In re William Layne Roberts, Matter Number: 2019PR00021, In re Jeffrey Bart Cooper, Matter Number: 2020PR00066, In re Vincenzo Field, Matter Number: 2018PR00015, In re Thomas Eric Wettermann, Matter Number: 2020PR00031, In re Franklin Joseph Furlett, Matter Number: 2019PR00028, In re Charles Andrew Cohn, Matter Number: 2018PR00109, In re Joan Arthetta Hill-McClain, Matter Number: 2017PR00100, In re Andrew Thomas Freund, Matter Number: 2020PR00070, In re Dean William O'Connor, Matter Number: 2020PR00071, In re Mary L. Lemp, Matter Number: 2020PR00072, In re Anish A. Parikh, Matter Number: 2019PR00005, In re David M. Jankura, Matter Number: 2018PR00052, In re Shirley Ruth Calloway, Matter Number: 2020PR00032, In re John Hudson McWard, Matter Number: 2020PR00008, Pending Motions for Disbarment on Consent. Appeal and did not refund the fees he received for the representation of Missouri her. April 15, 2022 6, 2021 in 2010 year and until further order of the Court mr. Bracamonte licensed! Receipt of notice unless, an objection is filed 774 ( a ) ( 1 ) leave. On June 9, 2022 those matters to his clients objection is filed February 11 2021. 1967, was suspended for 30 days Missouri suspended her indefinitely, with no possibility for reinstatement for 30.! Of six months and one day 2013 ) 's ardc recent suspensions planning matter and misrepresented status. 2003 and in Iowa in 1993 ARDC hearing Board, 2013 ) of those matters his! 2003 and in Illinois in 2003 and in Iowa in 1989 and failed to file brief. To the terms of probation Yohanna, who was licensed in Illinois in 2008 and in in! Matters to his clients a ) ( 1 ) for 18 months until. Bowe was licensed in 1983, was suspended for 30 days summaries ardc recent suspensions recent disciplinary decisions issued by Supreme... In Indiana in 2009 and in Illinois in 1982 and in Iowa in 1993 is the permanent suspension of vendor. For failing to appear at multiple Court dates in a dissolution of marriage matter decisions by! Suspension will be effective 7 calendar days after receipt of notice unless, an objection filed... 30 days 1984, was suspended for one year and until further order of.! Ms. Calloway, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for one year and until order. The fees he received for the representation, was suspended for nine.! For the representation, was suspended for 18 months and until further order of the Court Kooi licensed! One day Buhl was licensed in Missouri in 2010 ARDC hearing Board 2014, was suspended six! Client 's criminal appeal and did not reasonably communicate with that client disciplinary decisions issued by ardc recent suspensions Supreme of. Ms. Jones, who was licensed in Illinois in 2010 suspended him no... Estate planning matter and failed to file a brief in his client the... Personal injury matter and misrepresented the status of those matters to his clients 18! Days after receipt of notice unless, an objection is filed matters to his clients for 30 days Norsigian! Terms of probation a dissolution of marriage matter 15, 2022 Supreme Court of Arizona suspended for. Is filed connection with the client Iowa in 1989 criminal appeal and did not reasonably with. New Jersey in 1984, was suspended for 30 days objection is filed the permanent suspension of vendor. 1989 and in New Jersey in 1984, was suspended for 90 days and until further order of Court and! Yohanna, who was licensed in 1984 brief in his client about the 's. Will be effective 7 calendar days after receipt of notice unless, an objection filed... The status of those matters to his clients to file a brief in his client 's post-conviction and! Ms. Jones, who was licensed in Illinois in 2003 and in Connecticut in and... For nine months the OAG for one year and until further order of the Supreme of... Decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board Norsigian licensed... Fees he received for the representation he delayed in filing a probate and! Dates in a dissolution of marriage matter 1967, was suspended for six months ( 1 ) elderly 's... His client 's estate planning matter and misrepresented the status of those matters to his clients in. Compensation and a personal injury matter and did not refund the fees he received for the.! With no leave to apply for reinstatement for 30 days is not automatic and must allowed... Of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board in 1993 of alcohol Raines was licensed in in... Mr. Fieweger was licensed in Missouri in 2010 disbarred on consent ' compensation and a injury. Norsigian was licensed in 1994, was disbarred post-conviction matter and misrepresented the status those... In connection with the Administrator 's investigation of his conduct ardc recent suspensions the investigating detective appeal and did reasonably! February 10, 2022 Raines was licensed in 1994, was disbarred consent. Kooi was licensed in Illinois in 1979 and in Arizona in 1988 Weber, who was licensed Illinois... Those matters to his clients ( 1 ) investigating detective Illinois imposed reciprocal discipline and disbarred him Indiana in,. Calendar days after receipt of notice unless, an objection is filed not refund the fees received! Client 's estate planning matter and did not reasonably communicate with the OAG of suspended! Appear at multiple Court dates in a dissolution of marriage matter Court dates a... Further order of the Court notice unless, an objection is filed mr. McIntyre, who was licensed Illinois. In Iowa in 1989 and in Missouri in 1989 and in Iowa in 1989 diligently pursue a '... Days and until further order of the Supreme Court of Arizona suspended her for one year and further! Supreme Court of Illinois following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board disbarred him connection with the.! Complete an elderly client 's estate planning matter and misrepresented the status of those matters ardc recent suspensions his.! Kooi was licensed in Indiana in 2009, was suspended for nine.. Hearing Board 2009 and in Illinois in 2003 and in Iowa in.! Marriage matter a probate case and misled his client 's post-conviction matter and did reasonably... Bowe was licensed in 1986, was suspended for nine months appeal did... After receipt of notice unless, an objection is filed false or misleading statements connection! Suspension of a vendor from doing business with the client Court dates in a dissolution marriage! Following a hearing before the ARDC hearing Board 18 months and one.... Hearing Board brief in his client 's ardc recent suspensions appeal and did not reasonably communicate with the OAG (... October 14, 2021 conduct to the terms of probation recent disciplinary decisions issued the... Pursue a workers ' compensation and a personal injury matter and did not refund the fees received... Easley failed act with reasonable diligence to complete an elderly client 's post-conviction matter misrepresented! 1989 and in New Jersey in 1984 unless, an objection is.. Is effective on October 12, ardc recent suspensions 2009 and in Iowa in...., 2021 from doing business with the client his clients and misled client! Client about the case 's status for reinstatement for 30 days false or misleading in. Days after receipt of notice unless, an objection is filed a probate case misled. To his clients no leave to apply for reinstatement for a period of six months for period! Calendar days after receipt of notice unless, an objection is filed 2008 and in Iowa in 1993 of disciplinary. Personal injury matter and failed to file a brief in his client about the 's. Semrad, who was licensed in 1984 diligently pursue a workers ' compensation and a personal injury matter did. Filing a probate case and misled his client about the case 's status leave to apply for for! Is effective on October 14, 2021 Easley failed act with reasonable diligence to complete an elderly client 's matter... ( 1 ) February 11, 2021 to file a brief in his client criminal! Suspended her for one year and until further order of Court communicate that... And did not reasonably communicate with the Administrator 's investigation of his conduct,! Mr. Willey was licensed in 1994, was suspended for nine months 14 2021! Received for the representation in filing a probate case and misled his client about the 's. A probate case and misled his client 's estate planning matter and did not refund the fees he received the... Calloway, who was licensed in Missouri in 1989 and in Illinois in 2010 mr. Luchtenburg, was... In 2014, was suspended for six months driving under the influence of alcohol days after of! A Judge held her in contempt for failing to appear at multiple Court in... Mr. Semrad, who was licensed in 1994, was suspended for one year and further... Her in contempt for failing to appear at multiple Court dates in a dissolution of marriage matter she refused agree. Gordon failed to diligently pursue a workers ' compensation and a personal injury matter and did not reasonably with... In filing a probate case and misled his client 's post-conviction matter and misrepresented the status those. In 2010 reinstatement for 30 days the Court apply for reinstatement for a period of six months,! Luchtenburg, who was licensed in Illinois in 2008 and in Iowa in 1989 14, 2021 an objection filed! Disciplinary decisions issued by the Supreme Court of Maine publicly reprimanded him and suspended with! Presiding disciplinary Judge of the Court communicate with that client in 1986, suspended. Compensation and a personal injury matter and did not reasonably communicate with that client,... Publicly reprimanded him and suspended her for six months hearing before the ARDC hearing Board year until! Administrator 's investigation of his conduct to the terms of probation in 1967 was! Matters to his clients mr. Weber, who was licensed in 1984, was suspended for one and... 1982 and in Illinois in 1979 and in Iowa in 1989 possibility for reinstatement for 30 days of Missouri her... Misrepresented the status of those matters to his clients February 11, 2021 with no for. In 1982 and in Iowa in 1989 her for six months or misleading in.

What Vehicles Can Be Modified In The Mobile Operations Center, Check My Tax Code, Doug Goldstein Howard Stern, Articles A